Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Help Matthew Moore: A Living Trayvon Martin

This article is from my new "Save Living Trayvon's Blog" http://SaveLivingTrayvons.blogspot.com

UPDATE:  MATTHEW MOORE speaks on video about his wrongful conviction in Louisiana. Matthew rejected a teacher's sexual overtures when he was 17, and Anderson retaliated by falsely accusing the teen of revealing his penis to her in the school hall where Matthew worked a summer job. Authorities refused to release videos from the school's surveillance camera to exonerate Matthew. Sentencing is scheduled for August 14 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBGLfWct_SI  Weeks after Matthew was falsely accused by Anderson, a bipolar volunteer in the same school. The woman had been forced to undergo psychological counseling by the school's administration because of her compulsive lying. When she heard about Matthew's accusation in the school grapevine, the mentally challenged worker told her own tale of having seen Matthew's penis. Matthew Moore's attorney did not reveal the mental dysfunction of the witness to the jury. Neither did he tell the jury about Anderson's history. A male high school student and his mother had lodged charges against Anderson the prior year, alleging that Anderson was fondling the student. The jury was not informed about the system's refusal to release videos from the school cameras. The jury was not informed that the district attorney was also of counsel for the school board and had a vested interest in protecting the school from more student complaints about the pedophile tendencies of Ms Anderson. The jury was not informed that Matthew Moore's mother had filed a complaint against the district attorney prior to his bringing charges against Matthew, and that he had promised to arrest her son, apparently in retaliation for the complaint she filed. The D.A. refused to recuse himself from Matthew Moore's case, despite his conflicts of interest, and neither would the court recuse him. Juries can only decide cases on the evidence they hear in court. Defense attorneys should ensure that juries have all the evidence that would lead to just decisions, but they often do not do that. In fact, some defense attorneys are private prison stockholders. See Matthew Moore's video embedded below.



ORIGINAL ARTICLE PUBLISHED BEFORE MATTHEW'S CONVICTION BEGINS BELOW:

TRAYVON MARTIN WAS a youth who lost his life to violence. Unfortunately, there are many Trayvons who are killed or injured or imprisoned every day - young men who are minorities or of the working class. This blog will tell their stories. Together, we will give their victimization the attention deserved. We will work for justice on behalf of more Trayvon Martins who lost their lives or suffered catastrophic injuries wrongly and attempt to save some Trayvon Martins who face wrongful incarceration. This blog will tell their stories, carry petitions, and remind us all of a handsome teen who probably died because he wore a hoodie and liked Skittles. (Select "go to page 1" if you use certain cell phones. Stalkers were hired to prevent your knowing about Matthew)

AS YOU MIGHT EXPECT, a living Trayvon Martin needs your help. His name is Matthew Moore. Please read the summary below and email Attorney General Eric Holder in support of Matthew Moore using this emal link AskDOJ@usdoj.gov


Matthew Moore was falsely accused of indecent exposure by a senior female educator while he worked at his school when he was 17 years old in 2009. Working at the school had been Moore's summer job for two years when the 51-year-old educator accused Matthew of walking in the hall behind her with his private parts showing. Matthew was suspended on the basis of the woman's unsubstantiated allegations despite inconsistencies in her story. Matthew's mother, Katherine Conner, asked to see film from cameras in the school's hall that could possibly show what happened, but her request was denied. Conner questioned Matthew's accuser about inconsistencies in the educator's story and actions that Conner found suspicious. The woman became angry and pressed charges against Matthew.

The District Attorney in their Louisiana parish also served as Legal Counsel to the School Board. He already had a vendetta against Conner because she had filed complaints against him and a judge over a year before Matthew was suspended. Katherine Conner had a dispute with an unlicensed contractor from Mississippi who repaired  her home after Katrina. The contract between Conner and the contractor required her to pay $7,000 up front and $7,000 upon completion of the work. The contractor asked for and received monies for material purchases several times from Conner during the project. However, when the job was done, Conner's contractor did not subtract those pre-payments from her balance due. Katherine Conner had so much going on when the sub-contractor presented her with a final bill and she wrote him a check for the full $7,000. Immediately after the contractor left her home with her check, Conner remembered the money she had already paid. She called the contractor and asked for him to return the check so she could deduct the amount she already paid. The contractor refused to return Conner's check and accept payment in the correct amount, so Conner canceled the check.

Katherine Conner's contractor accused her of theft of services. She was arrested, prosecuted and convicted regarding a matter that seemed more appropriate for civil court. Conner wrote a complaint against the judge and prosecutor. It appears that the court retaliated against Conner through her son.

Matthew would never do such a thing as he is accused of having done. He is a respectful, hard working young man who had a lovely girlfriend his own age. Until recently, Matthew and Katherine thought they had a witness - another student. But some boys started a fight with Matthew's witness, and the youth was put on probation as a result. At this point, the witness's mother will not let him testify for Matthew out of fear that her own child would be further penalized if he helps Matthew. A major civil rights organization to which  Katherine Conner was a member also declined to help Matthew and recommended that she go to another human/civil rights organization..Minorities in Katherine's parish feel intimidated by the power and ruthlessness of the court. Conner said Matthew's attorney is also a disappointment to them as he seems afraid to present all the evidence and subpoena the video from the school's camera.

Matthew is so concerned about COURT ON APRIL 23, 2012, that he went from 130 pounds to around 100 pounds within months. The young man had started school in his community college, but he had to withdraw to save his GPA because of the stress he feels. PLEASE PRAY FOR MATTHEW MOORE AND CONTACT THE USDOJ FOR HIM. DO YOUR BEST TO SOLICIT HELP FOR MATTHEW FROM PEOPLE WHO WOULD CARE ABOUT A PROMISING YOUTH BEING RAILROADED INTO PRISON AS RETALIATION FOR HAVING AN OUTSPOKEN BLACK MOTHER WHO THOUGHT SHE HAD RIGHTS LIKE I ONCE DID. Neither Katherine Conner nor her son had ever experienced any trouble with the law prior to the debacle with the contractor. Please agree it is unacceptable that a fine young man may lose years of his life behind bars as punishment for having an outspoken mom.

Please help to save Matthew Moore, a living Trayvon Martin. He is guilty of nothing and should not lose his freedom or even his life in prison because his mother stood up for herself in their Louisiana parish.

*****
Please don't let Trayvon Martin's death be in vain. Give attention to the young people you read about in the SAVE LIVING TRAYVONS blog and other news sources. Help them, please, or assist their families' justice quests you read about young people who suffered wrongful death in this blog like Trayvon did. Let no murder, abuse, or wrongful prosecution go without helping to expose and oppose the injustice. By consistently demanding accountability about such abuses, we can reduce or even eliminate them altogether. Let us henceforth be so vigilant that the Zimmermans of the world will count the cost before harming another child.

Trayvon Martin's shooting death gets exceptional attention, and  his outrageous murder helped raise awareness about such tragedies that are all too common. Insist on the same accountability for every murder, abuse, and wrongful prosecution that minority and working class youths suffer.  Whenever we expose and oppose injustice against a young person, we make the world safer for living Trayvons. Help show the Zimmermans of America that we won't take it any longer. We are all Trayvon Martin! We are all Matthew Moore!



This article is from my new "Save Living Trayvon's Blog" http://SaveLivingTrayvons.blogspot.com

Blessings,
Mary Neal
Website - Wrongful Death of Larry Neal http://WrongfulDeathOfLarryNeal.com
Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill
http://www.care2.com/c2c/group/aimi

FIVE LINKS. TABS:  AfricanAmerican, KatherineConner, legalethics, Louisiana, MaryLovesJustice, MatthewMoore, TrayvonMartin, Zimmerman



12 comments:

  1. HONEY, "NOBODY KNOWS THE TROUBLE I SEEN" POSTING THIS NEWS ABOUT A YOUNG BLACK MAN WHO NEEDS HELP AVOIDING WRONGFUL CONVICTION BECAUSE HIS BLACK MAMA THOUGHT SHE WAS "SOMEBODY" AND FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST A LA JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR. Racism is worse than ever in the USA. I met one of my stalkers once when he came to my home to substitute himself for the computer repair person I had called. Michael Moon was a young black man - around age 25 to 30 years of age. To think that he or someone else black like him is probably hired by other people who look like us to prevent justice for Matthew Moore is the worse hypocrisy and evidence of self-hatred and sell-outs I ever thought about. Bless you, Michael. Bless you, Matthew. Black men need God's help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right Mary! I couldn't believe my son would be convicted over such nonsense, but should have known better from what happen to me. We as a black people are dIvided, and many of us are our own worst enemy. I should have known he would be convicted after hiring 4 lawyers, and none would present the compelling evidence I have, or attack these Criminal Educators credibility. That is exactly why we have so many criminal teachers in our schools today. And what he was convicted on was their word against his, and on 2 different occassions, AND BOTH TIMES, NO WITNESSES, OR CAMERAS? Why would any 17 year old expose himself to SENIOR CITIZENS, old enough to be his GRANDMOTHER? It is a lie, but the truth is going to come out. I WANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THE EVIDENCE I HAVE, IN BOTH OUR CASES. I AM SO GLAD FOR THE MOVIE LAWLESS AMERICA THAT WILL EXPOSE THIS KIND OF HIDEOUS CORRUPTION.

      Delete
  2. Minorities and working class whites who use less expensive cell phones, please elect to "go to page 1" or they will begin the article in the middle of this information to make you miss seeing the first part. It is called censorship to hide abuses and murders of blacks. They do it to me all the time to hide Larry Neal's secret murder under false arrest. I am sad they are doing it to Matthew Moore's story. That does not bode well. Yet, we have faith in God.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary,
      If the young so called blacks didn't as you stated, didn't do all this junk, they wouldn't have all these problems, and people just make up things, This Marylovesjustice, just makes things up. She said things about Martin that are just a lie, he was a little thug, over 6' tall, into all kinds of junk, dope, break ins, has been stopped by the police for doing many things with jewerly and screw driver in his back pack, run out of school for dope, he was a little crook.

      Delete
  3. Door man, even if Trayvon Martin was a thug and crook like you say, the neighborhood watchman had no right to murder him. That is why Zimmerman is in jail now and may be convicted and serve time. If people were allowed to kill all the thugs and crooks, we would probably have to elect new representatives throughout the nation. If Martin was the person you say he was, he probably would have been an attorney or politician some day if not for his untimely death.

    What are your thoughts about Matthew Moore's case? He was a hardworking, studious young man who was wrongly convicted in April and faces sentencing in September.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Mary. Matthew will be sentenced on August 14.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems like you were right. His sentencing has been postponed until September 11, 2012.

      Delete
  5. We are asking for legal counsel to file an appeal in Matthew Moore's case. This case stems from false allegations and prosecutorial misconduct:

    1) Witness no. 1 said she saw Matthew Moore's penis as he worked his summer job at a school. The woman was fantasizing and asked Matthew "Are you modeling for me?" She likely wanted Matthew to flirt with her and was offended by his firm put-down: "No, I am working." The teacher chased another male student so bad the year before coming after Matthew that she reportedly grabbed the student's penis, and the assaulted student and his mom made reports about the teacher to the school board.

    2) The D.A. who prosecuted Matthew Moore is also of counsel for the school board. His job is to protect the school board from lawsuits that could result from this female teacher continually assaulting and talking dirty to male students.

    3) Witness no. 2 is reportedly bipolar. She was commanded to get psychiatric help due to her compulsive lying, which endangered her job before she ever lied on Matthew Moore. When she recognized the harm she did by lying on Moore, she is reported to have been crying at school and saying, "I didn't know it would go this far. I want to withdraw my testimony, but they won't let me."

    4) The D.A. had already prosecuted Matthew Moore's mom on charges stemming from a dispute she had with a contractor who patched her home after Katrina. Katherine Conner felt her home repair dispute should be in civil court rather than criminal court, and she objected to her probation associated with her conviction taking 70% of her income. She filed a complaint against the D.A. and judge in her case.

    5) Months later, the same D.A. (who worked for the school board and who Katherine Conner had filed a complaint against) screamed at Katherine Conner in public that he did not like her "attitude" and would arrest her son and see that he stayed in jail.

    6) During Matthew Moore's trial, both the prosecution's witnesses collaborated in the courtroom. The bipolar teacher was allowed to stay in court during the first teacher's testimony so she could rehearse what to say (the two teachers who brought false reports were a possible pedophile the school board's counsel (the D.A.) wanted to protect from lawsuit and a bipolar woman).

    7) Matthew Moore was denied the video from the security cameras in the school where he worked to prove he never revealed his penis to 50-year-old teachers who remind him of his grandmother.

    Matthew Moore was a hardworking student who rejected a teacher's sexual advances. He should not be lied on and railroaded into jail because he was prosecuted by a D.A. who doubles as counsel for the school board in his parish - a man who already hated Moore's mother and felt like the black woman needed to be taught a lesson because she filed a complaint against the D.A. in another matter.

    If you can assist Matthew Moore, please do so. His sentencing date is August 14. Prayers and practical assistance would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is my opinion that Matthew Moore's conviction also stems from ineffectual counsel. The jury did not hear any explanation as to why two teachers would lie on Matthew Moore. The defense attorney did not show evidence that Witness No. 1 was accused of feeling-up a boy a year before lying on Matthew, and that Witness No. 2 was forced by the school board to take psychiatric counseling after showing herself to be a bipolar compulsive liar. Neither did the jury learn about the D.A.'s reasons for bringing the false allegations to court: a) he had a vendetta against Katherine Conner, and b) the D.A. had a conflict of interest as counsel for the school board. If I had been on the jury, I might have convicted Matthew Moore, also. The defense attorney simply did not present the case for reasonable doubt about Matthew Moore's guilt.

    Blessings!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The film from the school cameras should have been made available to me and Matthew. Two senior citizens claimed they saw Matthew exposed in two different schools, but each time I was ignored when I asked to see the cameras. Both of these educators are old enough to be his grandmother, and Mrs. Deborah Anderson is the most militant educator in the entire Jackson Complex School, and the most controversial as I later discovered after starting a petition to have her investigated and removed. The second educator, Mrs. Paige Fleming Guillory has bipolar disease,and was taking counseling at her own school, had lost custody of her children because of her mental illness, and lied to corroborate Mrs. Anderson's story. Matthew was charged with obscenity, although he was convicted of two counts of attempted obscenity, I cannot phantom why any 17 year old would suddenly be in hot pursuit of two senior citizens old enough to be his grandmother where there are cameras, and others are in the building including his supervisor that could have walked up on him at anytime,yet we weren't allowed to examine the camera film.

      Delete
    2. Although much evidence was suppressed and no argument was made by Matthew's attorney, the jury did not follow the law in convicting Matthew, as was done when I was convicted. I am not saying this because Matthew is my son, but to convict someone on hearsay alone,(a young man, no prior criminal record) is not enough, regardless of the plaintiffs position or title, and especially with the fast growing number of pedophile teachers in our schools today, committing all kinds of sexual crimes against students. As a juror I would have to see cameras, which is a federal law, examine the location, and would have raised the question of why there were two felonies on the table, obscenity, and attempted obscenity to choose from in convicting a young person who had nothing in his criminal record, and no evidence to support the individual allegations of these educators? Many jurors who are selected to serve in East Feliciana Parish are passive, intimidated by the court, and do not follow the law in making their decisions. It appears the jurors base their decision on what they think, or feel happened, opposed to evidence and the law. Louisiana was found to have the highest rate of incarceration in the prison nation. That means it is highest in the world.

      Please view these links.

      The wrongful conviction of Matthew Moore
      http://www.facebook.com/groups/171271056328880/

      http://www.facebook.com/AXJLEGAL

      The wrongful conviction of Katherine Conner
      http://thechangetheworldmovement.com/2012/05/louisiana-justice-east-feliciana-parish/#comments

      Delete
  7. August 10 UPDATE WITH VIDEO BY MATTHEW MOORE (which I will embed again, because stalkers removed it time I hit "submit")

    UPDATE: MATTHEW MOORE speaks on video about his wrongful conviction in Louisiana. Matthew rejected a teacher's sexual overtures when he was 17, and Anderson retaliated by falsely accusing the teen of revealing his penis to her in the school hall where Matthew worked a summer job. Authorities refused to release videos from the school's surveillance camera to exonerate Matthew. Sentencing is scheduled for August 14 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBGLfWct_SI Weeks after Matthew was falsely accused by Anderson, a bipolar volunteer in the same school. The woman had been forced to undergo psychological counseling by the school's administration because of her compulsive lying. When she heard about Matthew's accusation in the school grapevine, the mentally challenged worker told her own tale of having seen Matthew's penis. Matthew Moore's attorney did not reveal the mental dysfunction of the witness to the jury. Neither did he tell the jury about Anderson's history. A male high school student and his mother had lodged charges against Anderson the prior year, alleging that Anderson was fondling the student. The jury was not informed about the system's refusal to release videos from the school cameras. The jury was not informed that the district attorney was also of counsel for the school board and had a vested interest in protecting the school from more student complaints about the pedophile tendencies of Ms Anderson. The jury was not informed that Matthew Moore's mother had filed a complaint against the district attorney prior to his bringing charges against Matthew, and that he had promised to arrest her son, apparently in retaliation for the complaint she filed. The D.A. refused to recuse himself from Matthew Moore's case, despite his conflicts of interest, and neither would the court recuse him. Juries can only decide cases on the evidence they hear in court. Defense attorneys should ensure that juries have all the evidence that would lead to just decisions, but they often do not do that. In fact, some defense attorneys are private prison stockholders. See Matthew Moore's video embedded below.

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE PUBLISHED BEFORE MATTHEW'S CONVICTION BEGINS BELOW:

    ReplyDelete