PART 1: ONLINE PETITION SABOTAGE
Hello, online friends. Thank you for reading and signing my petition for free speech and freedom of press. I wanted to accomplish several things by publishing the petition. Most important among them is to expose the fact that such a petition is needed in the first place. I believe many people in the United States are denied freedom of expression, which is a supremely important human right and the foundation of democracy. Without the First Amendment, all other rights are voided.
I especially appreciate signatures with comments on the petition. I copied some to publish below:
Debbie Chapman ~ After taking a moment to read this petition, there is only one decision to be made. It is time to right a wrong. It is time to hear Mary's cry, take action, and fix a broken system. We need to protect the human rights of all, there is no room in our system for injustices. It's time to bond together, make our voices heard.
Jennie Bloom ~ Mary has been denied basic human rights: freedom of speech and association.
Yely Lod ~ You are doing great work Mary. The world could be changed only by activists, not the government. So keep fighting and you win
Susan Hammett ~ My human rights are also being violated. My prayers are with you.
I note certain Changes about the format of iPetition since I posted my petition for free speech on that site.
a) The signatures displayed are no longer numbered. As I published in an article called "Internet Censorship American Style," people can determine how many signatures have been stolen from a petition by noting the number that appears beside their names. If you sign as petitioner 44 on Monday and your signature displays as number 24 on Friday, it means the names of 20 people who signed before you have been removed.
b) Only the latest few signatures are on view. That prevents individuals from being able to see that their signatures have been removed, and it hides the petitioners' comments of support.
Removing the option to see all signatures and comments deprives petitioners of their freedom of press rights. Petitions are ordinarily attacked in America, and signatures are removed. Therefore, online petitions are unreliable. However, petitions are useful tools for communicating if the data is on public view.
Failure to make all signatures and comments visible censors Americans. It hides what petitioners wrote about the subject while also making it possible to steal signatures without detection. It is obvious when signatures are stolen because despite having numerous new signatures on view, the number of total signatures does not advance appropriately. The number of views for my YouTube videos do not advance as they should. Friends and I tested by having office workers open my videos one person after another, and the total number of views did not advance. One reason why the number of views on articles and videos and signatures on petitions are controlled is to keep ratings low for certain ideas and information. Another is to stifle financial advancements by targeted persons.
If you would like to read/sign the petition for my First Amendment rights at iPetitions, please use this url:
I chose iPetitions specifically because the signatures were numbered and all petitioners' comments were on view. Within a few months, that Changed. Other ways advocacy for human rights is sabotaged in the United States are in "Internet Censorship American Style, by Mary Neal"
Crimes against humanity in America are covered-up, then there is an attempt to cover-up the cover-up. I am America's most censored person. Many examples of my censorship are in a blog I started to reveal this information: "Justice Gagged"
Saboteurs prevented the url I placed within the body of my petition from being a live link by removing the space between the link and the word before it. Many people may not know that all one has to do to access information at a link that does not work is to simply copy the link (remove spaces, if applicable), and enter it in a search engine like Google. The link that was sabotaged at iPetitions opens a video that proves my Internet censorship to protect the private prison industry, called "Prison Labor Profits."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icRD77mugaI It is a very short video showing stalkers corrupting information as I type online in order to protect prison investors. The video is embedded below.
PART II: WAR ON BLACKS
Lynching is still legal, but until recently one had to become a police officer to enjoy that sport. In 2013, that Changed. Private citizens can now kill black people and say they did the murder because they felt threatened. This started after the Zimmerman verdict, and numerous blacks have been murdered by Caucasians who are not in law enforcement since the verdict was handed down. The latest such killing may have been of a mailman who was delivering mail after dark in the Washington, D.C. area. a young lady, 19, was murdered in Michigan when she went on a Caucasian man's porch. A football player was killed by police when he knocked on a white woman's door and frightened her. He wanted to use the phone after enduring a car wreck. A Florida man was also shot by a Caucasian man who saw him running exposed down the street (his clothes had been stolen).
Medicaid was removed for psychiatric inpatient treatment from public hospitals in the 1960s in order to start America's private prison system by overcrowding the nation's public prisons and jails with mentally challenged people. Now Medicaid for mentally ill inpatients is back, but only for specific facilities. Every attempt must be made to see that abuses of citizens' rights do not happen in the private psych hospitals that receive Medicaid funds. Below are five examples of abuses of power involving the mental health care system.
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff Florence Elizabeth Mason's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Florence Elizabeth Mason is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
The Court Order set forth specific due dates for plaintiff to make submissions to the court, etc. After receiving the Court Order, Mason was arrested and given a psychological evaluation, which she passed. The judge then ordered a second team to administer a psychological evaluation days later around 10:30pm. The psych team awakened Mason and demanded a second evaluation after bed time. This probably caused the inmate, who had been sleeping, to feel disoriented and angry, because Mason knew she had already passed the evaluation once. This time, Mason was said to have failed the evaluation and is therefore eligible for commitment to a mental hospital, or she could already be in a prison psych ward. Mason feels this was done to interfere with her lawsuits.
The legal system can simply arrest ANYONE, INCLUDING YOU, and deliver individuals into a private psychiatric hospital on the supposition that they are psychotic. More information will be provided about Mason in "Dog Justice for Mentally Ill blog" by January 7, 2014, at http://DogJusticeforMentallyIll.blogspot.com
3) A young black man is indefinitely detained in a Pennsylvania prison today where he has been denied a trial for 4.5 years. Every time Terrell Scott's case should go to trial, either his attorney asks for a continuance or his prosecutor apparently files a false statement with the court claiming that Scott is not available because he is in a psychiatric hospital. Meanwhile, Scott's attorney allegedly tries to get the innocent young man to accept plea deals. In most states, if not all of them, defense attorneys cannot be sued for malpractice if the defendant accepts a plea deal.
Below is a pdf of Terrell Scott's Court Docket, pages 20-21.